@ECOSAM-SG

🇸🇬 Thank you, CNA! 🔥 USAID on hold? WHO funding cut? Global aid disrupted? Guess who REALLY suffers? Small nations! 💰 America pulls out, big powers fight for influence, and who gets squeezed? Countries like Singapore, where 99% of businesses are SMEs, employing 71% of our people and contributing the biggest tax revenue! 💵💪 Together, let's focus on growing local industries? 👍

@weatherlou

The gravy train needs to end…ASAP

The tax payer money waste and laundering is probably just the tip of the ice berg

@happymelon7129

ElonMusk:
In 2023 , data show that ..
...U$A1D  $  --> trained  9000 journalist .

@xxoo-lp6vc

😆Why midia so unhappy when Musk try to stop  $tax$  $  flow to foreign ?
🤪Did the midia get a share?

@happymelon7129

😅The end of USA1D $ for cna ?

@happymelon7129

March 11  -- The Canberra-based Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), an anti-China think tank, has reportedly halted its China-related research projects after the U.S. government froze foreign funding and international programs.

In a recent interview with The Wall Street Journal, the institute confirmed that the suspension of U.S. funding has forced it to halt approximately 1.2 million U.S. dollars' worth of China-related research and data projects focused on cybersecurity and technology issues.

Established in 2001, ASPI labels itself as an "independent, non-partisan" think tank, yet it has frequently promoted false narratives about China. An Australian source once revealed that the institute has long received funding from the U.S. government and is deeply invested in fabricating and exaggerating anti-China issues with a strong ideological bias.

ASPI disclosed that since 2019, U.S. government grants have made up approximately 10 to 12 percent of its operating budget and funded around 70 percent of its China-related research projects. In the 2022-2023 fiscal year alone, the institute received nearly 3 million Australian dollars (1.9 million U.S. dollars) in grants from the U.S. State Department.

However, the grants came to a halt when the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump ordered the immediate halt of most existing foreign aid programs under the U.S. Department of State in January.

@VEGANWARRIOR

BS...THE WELFARE IS OVER. TIME TO GROW UP AND MOVE OUT OF MAMA'S HOUSE. GOOD LUCK.

@josenino7140

Why wont EU, CHINA and UK  step up? 

What happened to UK AID? 

So US giving aid to former BRITISH Colonies?

All i see is the hypocrisy from UK and EU. Maybe your reporter can send his money to compensate for the lack of USAID.

@Reed-sh6wi

Arikana Chihombori-Quao, the former ambassador of the African Union says: “The majority of African leaders and leaders in the developing world are celebrating the exit of USAID.”

“Show me one country where USAID was in, and education improved. Show me one country where USAID was in, and healthcare improved. The social services they’re bringing — it’s peanuts. The American taxpayer needs to know that the billions of dollars that are being given to USAID, only a fraction is making it to the people.”

She said USAID often entered countries under the guise of environmental, human rights or social justice agenda but the “real reason why USAID is in Africa … When you look at it on paper, it all looks really good. But they’re actually wolf in sheep’s clothing. They’re using that open access — sounding humanitarian — to constantly destabilize governments.”

@JusticeLaw22

The problem is that the staff with high positions directors and above (that might be those corrupted) won’t lose their job but the small fishes will pay the prices! We want directors and above out!

@བོདཁབཅན

America is amazing America feed whole world! China haaaaaaaaaa

@yongdac

CNA need to stop create biased news production and do unbiased news production like the past. You have only provided insight on people and countries that need US funding and not sufficient coverage on the claim that US funding is unproportionally large compare to others. Be an advocate of journalism, don't just copy and paste other new channels' perspectives.

@christopherchong592

i like CNA. their reporting is more through and less biase. is neutral reporting news.
others like to rub in their own opinion and agenda. and sometimes you doubt those news.